Anderson’s earlier Event Horizon - but no one came to AvP for complex human characters.
#Alien vs predator toys r us movie
Freddy Vs Jason wisely eschewed attempts at depth, instead simply giving viewers a set of over-the-top ‘80s movie characters and risking bad reviews by assuming viewers would be in on the joke.Īlien Vs Predator, in contrast, makes an effort to introduce its archeologist exploration team as believable, rounded characters like those of director Paul W.S. The cast is a set of goofy stereotypes whose fates viewers weren't invested in, and it was clear they existed primarily to be gorily killed by the two title characters - the ones audiences actually came to see. As a result, the cliches proved charming precisely because they were hard to relate to. But they are likable ones too and, although the successful slasher Scream offered a more believable set of teens, FvJ did not attempt to humanize its archetypical characters. The characters of Freddy Vs Jason, from the Jason Mewes-aping stoner to Monica Keena’s wide-eyed final girl, are all slasher movie cliches. Freddy Vs Jason’s (Likable) Cast of Cliches While there have been solid PG-13 horrors both before and since, they tend to be atmospheric chillers like The Othersor more comedic outings like Happy Death Day, where both Alien and Predator movies made extensive use of the bloodshed an R-rating allows. PG-13 horror was in the doldrums during the early 2000s, with the likes of Darkness Falls giving the rating a bad name among genre audiences. But giving the movie an inexplicable PG-13 weakened its appeal before audiences had even seen the movie, as the rating alone proved the face-off wouldn’t get too intense or gory. As proven by Alien Vs Predator: Requiem’s gory brutality, an R-rating alone would not have necessarily salvaged the original Alien Vs Predator’s reception. This one is a classic complaint most horror franchise fans will have heard before, but it bears repeating when all four franchises in question were R-rated until their crossover films, it only made sense for said showdowns to keep that adults-only rating. Freddy Vs Jason’s R-Rating Vs Alien Vs Predator’s PG-13 However, a closer look at both Freddy Vs Jason and Alien Vs Predator illustrates a set of differences between their approaches that shaped their receptions. With only a year separating the release of the two deathmatch movies between horror icons, it's hard on paper to see why only one was well-received. The 2004 movie was mostly disliked by fans of both franchises, and its 2007 sequel Alien Vs Predator: Requiem didn’t fare any better. Related: Friday the 13th Actor Who Almost Played Freddy Krueger (& Why He Didn't) Although the movie wasn’t as outright scary as the best installments of either series, the script had an agreeable streak of self-aware humor while its cast played proceedings dead straight. When Alien Vs Predator arrived in cinemas, though, audiences were let down by a face-off that failed to do either of the eponymous monsters justice. A year earlier, Freddy Vs Jason had received a mixed critical reception but proved a hit with fans of both slasher series, with the consensus being that the much-anticipated showdown did justice to both villains.Ĭrystal Lake’s mute madman Jason Voorhees was a perfect match for Robert Englund’s dream demon Freddy Krueger.
#Alien vs predator toys r us series
Released only a year apart, Freddy Vs Jason fared well with viewers while the sci-fi crossover Alien Vs Predatorwas a comparative disappointment, so why did one soar where the other sank? In 2004, audiences were excited to see the long-awaited face-off between two titans of sci-fi horror, the Xenomorph of the Alien series and the titular Predator of the action-horror franchise of the same name.
0 kommentar(er)
